perm filename PAPER.POX[EMS,LCS] blob
sn#517334 filedate 1980-06-15 generic text, type T, neo UTF8
\|\\M0SIGN57;\M1NGR30;\M2CLAR40;\M3GERM70;\M4BUCK75;\M5XMAS40;\M6BUCK75;
\F1\J The fact that I'm living in Silicon Valley, the high tech
capital of the U.S.A. and the center of much computer production and
research in artificial intelligence, has a lot to do with my
experimenting with computerized prints. In 1971 I was a painter and
printmaker, with an emphasis in etching. My husband, a composer and
professor of music at Stanford University, started working
enthusiastically at Stanford's advanced Artificial Intelligence
Laboratory on the then new PDP10 computer, developing musical
programs for sound production and graphic programs for the printing
of musical scores. At this time it seems everyone in Palo Alto was "playing"
with computers, including everyone in my family. It was great fun --
and the Stanford A.I. Lab, set in beautiful oak-studded hills covered
with grazing horses and cattle, was a kind of bucolic paradise,
providing a loose California-type ambiance that visitors from all
over the world have come to appreciate. Out of this "playing with
the computer," utilizing light pen techniques, as well as
computer-directed video camera work, I produced my first "computer
graphics." The Calcomp plotter, loaded with various colored felt
pens, drew out the images dictated by edge-finding programs. By
offsetting the images slightly, and changing the number coding, I
could produce a sort of counterpoint of "drawings" which had
intriguing compositions but which, in the long run, looked like
computer print-outs, on unattractive paper and in colors that faded
after a couple of years.
From the beginning I wanted to
incorporate the computer work into my own way of seeing, into my own,
developed, aesthetic style -- rather than to utilize the geometric
potential or the random number capability of the computer. It became
a tool that enabled me to enlarge on my established style. One of
the first prints, for example, called San Damiano Mix, was exhibited
in a solo show at Jason-Aver Gallery, San Francisco, in 1971. It was
part of a series of works leading up to an eight foot by eleven foot
cut-out triptych painting on St. Francis of Assisi (an ecological
statement). "San Damiano" refers to the small town near Assisi where
St. Francis received his first vision. What a far cry from the
minimilized subjects of most computer art!
I've never had available a flat-bed plotter, which would
enable me to go directly from the terminal to the finished fine
print, so I was forced to add the step of contact photography to the
opaque print-out. I produced a Kodalith film which I then exposed on
a photo-sensitive zinc plate.
I hit a lot of technical dead-ends at first. Then, in 1975,
I produced the VENUS etching. This was part of a series interpreting
the history of women's images, as presented by some of the great
artists, images that have molded our thinking about Women -- from the
Willendorff Venus through Botticelli, Titian, Goya, Picasso, and De
Kooning. The poem I wrote in 1974 was a playful accompaniment. The
series, MY feminist expression, included a number of watercolors,
pastels, two conventional etchings, and a five by eight foot cut-out
painting as its culmination. I fed the computer-directed video camera
one of the conventional etchings (thus cannibalizing my own work). I
also presented special conte crayon drawings to the camera, to be
processed by an edge-finding program. I typed in the poem and picked
a type font from the type setting program newly developed at the
Artificial Intelligence Lab. Then I programmed the computer to
disperse and turn the images and text by arithmetically changing
point locations on an X-Y axis. The T.V. camera conveyed the
dark-light pattern usually seen on a T.V. screen to the computer
memory. The programs found the edges of real or illusional objects
and sorted out levels of contrast that could be interpreted as edges.
Demarkation of maximum contrast created a firm line. Demarkation of
less value contrast created more fragile, broken, lines. Some of the
programs were first developed by NASA to ascertain the depth of moon
craters from photographic value contrasts. The output of the
programs was stored as hundreds of individual short line segments
which were produced as line drawing by the computer-operated plotter.
Line and etching were a natural pair -- and historically so. As
visual data were expressed in numbers, changes or "distortions" of
the image could be effected by applying multiplying, dividing,
adding, or subtracting factors to the numbers. Novel transformations
were achieved: the image could be curved in ways never before
visualized; turned inside out; serialized; compressed to one point
and then reversed; fattened; thinned; etc.
I decided my VENUS etching was interesting, but a bit rigid,
so I developed a second soft-ground plate to print in registration.
It echoes some of the purely linear women and gives them color
variety.
The gradual serial distortion produced by changing the
numbers suggested to me a more extended metamorphosis of forms. The
next two computerized etchings, finished in 1977, L'ISOLEMENT, had
their genesis in a strange way -- and that's significant, because
they are haunting and perhaps frightening. I was teaching a drawing
class for Foothill College, but this class, in the heyday of college
enrollments, was given off the campus, in a Junior High School
science room. I'd hired a male life model for the class to draw. As
they drew him from the front, I drew him from behind and THROUGH the
classroom's full-skeleton. His pose was accidentally like that of
Adam in Michelangelo's Sistine Chapel mural, with the tentatively
reaching hand. Later I made fourteen freshly executed sumi drawings
on long scrolls, rarifying them into the images finally chosen for
the computerized etchings -- and the poem, written in French,
presenting the feelings of the isolation of male and female. Man is
subject to the laws of Nature -- to Creation but also to Death -- and
without Woman he is lost in a kind of arrogance. The skeletal image
juxtaposed to the accidental Michelangelo pose was very touching. It
reminded me that even in birth the concept of Memento Mori haunts us.
These two etchings were exhibited in Brussels in 1978 -- where even
the poem passed muster.
Using similar techniques, I developed the two etchings,
SINGLE FIGURE SERIAL PRINTOUT WITH POEM and DOUBLE FIGURE SERIAL
PRINTOUT WITH POEM. One important aspect of this work was
portraiture -- and in a medium I've tried to revive among my
students, mezzotint. This is a painstaking hand process, rocking
with a rocker and scraping with a scraper on a copper plate. Working
in the Atelier de Gravure Calevaert-Brun in Paris during parts of
1974, 1975, 1978, and 1979, I produced four finished mezzotints.
Subjects: the people, hardware, and software of the Stanford A.I. Lab
-- robots moving on T.V. screens -- the now-renowned robot arms and
hands selecting and piling blocks -- computer-directed carts
cavorting around the picturesque landscape. Cannibalizing my
mezzotints, I photographed them, applied a mezzotint screen, and used
them as a basis for these serialized portrait prints. The registered
color plate, in each instance, is a monotype. The young man
manipulating the robot images is my son. The poem was written in
1978. It attempts to capture the feeling of this special place.
In 1979 and 1980 I finished three computer-assisted etchings
using black and white photographs of the A.I. hardware I'd taken over
the years -- hardware that was now becoming obsolete. The PDP6
computer is now headed for a computer historical museum at M.I.T.
The DEC PDP10 gave way to the PDP11 -- and the PDP11 to the new
Foonly F2, designed and built by alumni of the A.I. Lab.
Film-collage techniques and overlays are important aspects of these
etchings.
My most recent computer-assisted etchings combine a 1978
poem, ANCIENT CITIES, with digitized images from Yucatan and Paris.
They are based on very spontaneous, on-the-spot drawings of these
locales. I'm fascinated by the mood of PLACE. Architecture is a
voice of man; it houses man, but survives him. In 1978 I lived for a
few weeks among the Mayan ruins; in 1979 I lived for three months in
one room on the rue de Venise, 1/2 block from the Centre Pompidou,
with its continuous circus on the Square St. Martin. I spent hours
underground at the IRCAM computer center xeroxing on acetate the
drawings I'd made perched on the roof. Xerox on acetate functions on
photo sensitive etching plates the same way any transparent film
does.
Both Kokoshka and Derain have done electrifying landscapes in
which birds in flight have "fractured" the accepted sense of what the
architecture of the picture should be -- not just decorative birds
going on their way but birds suggesting man's spiritual state in his
environment. By the juxtaposition of the bird, the Mayan
architecture (reduced to minimal pattern), and the modern
architecture of the Centre Pompidou (also minimilized for barest
recognition), I've hoped to provide a foil for my word-play about how
Time, as we measure it, is a tool of our egos; without our egos, it
could be seen as a non-linear dimension.
Perhaps the new computer technologies will enable us to
achieve new aesthetic visions. I certainly hope so. I'm encouraged
by the broadmindedness of the people working in the advanced research
centers of the Santa Clara Valley and by the increasing availability
of low cost equipment. My work, which is just a small tapping of the
potential, shows that the computer can be harnessed to lyrical ideas
and can be part of traditional, refined, print mediums.\.
Edith Smith
June 12, 1980